| 要旨 |
In the evaluation of social programs, it is often difficult to conduct randomized controlled experiments
due to non-compliance; therefore the local average treatment effect (LATE) is commonly applied. However,
the LATE identifies the average treatment effect only for a subpopulation known as compliers and requires
the monotonicity assumption. Given these limitations of the LATE, this paper proposes a nonparametric
strategy to identify the causal effects for larger populations (such as the ATT and ATE) and to remove
the monotonicity assumption in the cases of non-compliance. Our strategy utilizes two types of auxiliary
observations, one is an outcome before assignment and the other is a treatment before assignment. These
observations do not require specially designed experiments, and are likely to be observed in baseline surveys
of the standard experiment or panel data. We show the results for the random assignment and those of multiply
robust representations in the case where the random assignment is violated. We then present details of the GMM
estimation and testing methods which utilize over-identified restrictions. The proposed strategy is
illustrated by empirical examples which revisit the studies by Thornton (2008), Gerber et al. (2009),
and Beam (2016), as well as the data set from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.
|
一橋大学 Official Web Site ≫
